By Ted Pattison

Development purposes and elements with visible simple .NET is the visible uncomplicated developer's advisor to the .NET framework and object-oriented programming. The authors introduce the fundamental structure of the .NET Framework and discover visible simple .NET's new OOP positive factors, the syntax required to exploit them, and the influence that syntax has on code habit. Readers achieve talents necessary to growing well-designed purposes and part libraries for the .NET Framework.

Show description

Read or Download Building applications and components with Visual Basic .NET PDF

Best visual basic books

Visual Basic 2005 with .NET 3.0 Programmer's Reference

With this thoroughly up to date instructional and reference, you will quick how to enhance visible uncomplicated (VB) courses that leverage the newest beneficial properties of Vista and . web three. zero. the educational part walks you thru VB. web from scratch, giving you in-depth descriptions of the advance surroundings, uncomplicated software syntax, and traditional controls.

Clearly Visual Basic: Programming with Microsoft Visual Basic 2010

As a way to examine the basics of programming, do not get slowed down with pages of technical jargon that almost all books out there provide! No past visible Studio event required for essentially visible easy: PROGRAMMING WITH MICROSOFT visible easy 2010, 2E through the best-selling writer, Diane Zak.

Extra info for Building applications and components with Visual Basic .NET

Example text

Similarly, a single assembly can contain types defined within several different namespaces. Thus namespaces and assemblies can have a many-to-many relationship. While no formal association exists between assemblies and namespaces, developers who design component libraries often prefer to create a unique namespace for each assembly project so as to uniquely identify all its types. HumanResources. While this approach is commonly used to organize the types defined within component libraries, you should understand that it is nothing more than a convention The important thing to remember is that you reference assemblies and you import namespaces.

NET compiles your code, every type that is built into the resulting assembly is defined within the scope of a namespace specified by the project's root namespace setting. This relationship can catch programmers off guard if they expect types defined outside the scope of an explicit Namespace declaration to be defined at the top-level default namespace. NET project, the IDE automatically assigns it a default setting for the root namespace that has the same name as the project itself. If you want to define types in the default namespace or if you only want to scope your types using explicit Namespace declarations, then you must clear the root namespace setting for your project before compiling your code.

Com. NET. Namespaces organize types in an effort to prevent naming conflicts. The full name of a type includes the name of its enclosing namespace. Therefore, two classes defined with the same name will not conflict with one another as long as they are defined in different namespaces. Let's look at a simple example to illustrate the importance of namespaces. Imagine you are writing an application in which you reference two other assemblies. What would happen if both of these assemblies contained a public type named Human?

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.19 of 5 – based on 12 votes